Saturday, February 8, 2014

Sustainable Living, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Urban Farms

Admin  /  at  9:07 PM  / 

by ANTHONY GREGORY on MAY 13, 2013 @ 5:31 PM

20100413__urban_homeIn Oakland, California, not far from where I live, urban homesteading – growing food on private land for small-scale trade and consumption – has become so common the city government was forced to back off for once. In a rare triumph for sanity and freedom, anachronistic zoning ordinances from 1965 were liberalized to accommodate the city farmers. Molly Samuel explained at KQED:

“The city has already made some changes; it’s now legal to grow and sell vegetables on an empty lot with a conditional use permit. . . . Oakland North reports one of the hotly debated topics [at a city meeting] was animal husbandry: Should Oaklanders be permitted to raise, slaughter, and sell animals? Or not?”

Despite the remaining government bureaucracy, we have to cheer on the homesteaders. They are so impossible to ignore, hundreds of them flooding a city meeting, that the tyranny of zoning is being ratcheted back for once.

 

And although it has a leftish quality, libertarians ought to take notice of this counter-cultural movement, whose localizing agenda poses profound implications for the future of liberty. With the economic forecasts dire and the corporatist system of mega-farms firmly gripping the Obama administration and all federal politics for the foreseeable future, our rights and perhaps very lives may depend on the freedom to farm at home.

 

Libertarians often straddle radically different, sometimes seemingly opposed, stereotypes. We are simultaneously atomist rugged individualists and slaves to the anonymous division of labor found in modern cosmopolitanism. This seeming paradox is reconciled in our simultaneous love of political localism and integrated economics, self-sufficiency and the contemporary blessings of a thriving voluntary community. And as admirers of both the frontier and the integrated city life, we can see much to relate to in the urban homesteaders and their hybrid lifestyle of city-slicking, strenuous agrarianism.

 

The urban farmers too suffer from being pigeonholed as the type you’d find in quasi-socialist hippie communes. Their community’s language and cultural habits can be jarring to a free market radical, but they need not be as dissonant as they first sound. When a libertarian hears the term “sustainable living” – another common theme in urban homesteading – he might first think of the central planning-nightmare called “sustainable development” or EPA-mandated encumbrances on his track housing. But we can as plausibly interpret the meaning to be: “freedom from the vagaries of the public utilities system and state-subsidized mass agriculture.”

 

Even in the larger sustainable living communities, we see a diversity of social organization. “Most cohousing communities with gardens use organic gardening practices, but just as the culture of cohousing groups varies widely, organizing and running a cohousing garden is a highly individualized project,” writes Jenise Aminoff in the Fall 2010 issue of Urban Farm magazine. Indeed, while voluntary communalism is totally compatible with libertarianism, even shameless capitalists can find much to love. Eno Commons, “a suburban cohousing community on the outskirts of Durham, N.C.,” initially ran its “garden on a standard allotment model, where each unit was assigned a garden plot,” but this led to problems: “there was a disconnect between a small handful of people doing work but the whole community picking,” explains garden manager Katherine Lee. And so what did they do? Aminoff explains:

“Last fall, Lee proposed a radical change: a market model. With Lee as the manager doing most of the gardening work, residents now pay for their garden produce. On the night of the community’s weekly common meal, Lee harvests the garden’s produce and brings it ‘to market’ in the common house.”

Surely, most other approaches to communal gardening involve a bit less commercial exchange, but from a quarter-acre urban homestead or an integrated sustainable living community to a produce co-op and the farmers’ markets that have gloriously emerged in every major city, we see there is no conflict between the market economy and sustainable farming in a municipal context. The way of life is no less libertarian than living in a condo or homeownership association.

 

 

Agricultural Independence and Urban Farms vs. the State

 

What are in conflict, however, are sustainable living and city pastures up against the agricultural bureaucracy, the USDA, FDA, and government at all levels. Certainly, those who offer major competition to Big Ag are targeted. There have been at least fifteen raids of raw milk farms during this administration alone. The federal government has cracked down on independent farmers in gruesome ways. Huge corn and soy subsidies have distorted our food supply, putting corn syrup in nearly every processed food, warped migration patterns and impoverished third-world economies. Even patents play a role in the farming hegemony: Monsanto, the corporate food giant with influence in the last three presidential administrations (including the current one), owns genes that can be found in 90% of America’s soy. Wind inevitably blows the seeds from Monsanto crops to those owned by smaller farmers, after which the company claims intellectual property rights over the land and forbids farmers to save seeds – a traditional agricultural practice – and even sues farmers for merely “encouraging” the violation of these patents.

 

But even for the small, non-commercial city farmer, the state has become a threat. Even the mildest displays of homegrown produce have run into legal trouble. In July 2011 news traveled fast of the plight of Julie Bass of Oak Park, Michigan, who was threatened with 93 days of jail time for the crime of planting vegetables in her front yard. A mere five raised beds featuring corn, tomatoes, squash and other vegetables constituted her great offense. Amid a massive public uproar, the city dropped the charges. In most areas of everyday life, the state has become ever more intrusive and invasive. On growing our own food, however, Americans appear sick of being on the defensive. The mainstream adoption of urban homesteading can lead to one of the great retrenchments of state power and influence in our times, echoing the homeschooling movement that has grown so impressively in recent years.

 

Much of the urban farm movement can be traced to the World War-era victory gardens – what we might call a market response to a statist emergency. The phenomenon of growing your own food (among other consumables) took off in the 1960s and 1970s and is now back in the cities, taking them by storm. Once again, they are coming in response to institutional crisis. In cities suffering in every other way, urban farms might save the day. The Detroit Agriculture Network’s Kristine Hahn points to the city’s “113 community gardens. . ., 18 school gardens, and 220 family gardens” as signs of hope for that suffering city’s future, writes Elizabeth Wahl.

 

It is a global phenomenon: The USDA estimates that urban areas grow about 15 percent of the food worldwide. In some countries, socialist regimentation has made private gardens absolutely necessary for survival. The Soviet government’s attempts to feed the masses were infamously disastrous, particularly in the calamitous era of Lyskensoism from the 1920s to early 1960s, when the Russian government imposed bizarre standards of agriculture along “proletarian” lines – the forced collectivization of farming and the rejection of genetics and mainstream botanical practices as being based in bourgeois pseudo-science. As the government began looking the other way, its citizens were finally able to feed themselves. By the late Soviet era, 90% of the nation’s fresh vegetables and a good deal of its animal products were from “unofficial sources” – meaning dacha gardens and the small private plots that collective farmers were permitted to work in their spare time,” according to the Christian Science Monitor. These private gardens became crucial in the post-Soviet upheaval as well. A 2008 survey conducted by the Public Opinion Fund found that 56% of urban Russians had a dachaor “kitchen garden.” The American government is still not as dysfunctional as Russia’s but the laws of economics apply universally. Should another financial collapse come, American dachas could be our lifeline.

 

At least implicitly distrustful of Washington, the urban homesteading movement gets bigger every day. With bigness, however, comes the threat of politicization, and in particular the threat of these farms being harvested by government, the co-ops being co-opted by the state. As with the bureaucratic nationalization of the word “organic” and the trouble we see with farmers running into Monsanto’s patent police, the voluntarism of sustainable living may one day be supplanted by regimented control and corporatism.

 

Read the Entire Article Here

 

 

 

 

 

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Share
Posted in: Posted on: Saturday, February 8, 2014

Labels

2012 (16) 50 (1) 8 Foods Even The Experts Won’t Eat (1) additives (1) Alternative fuel resources (1) alternative fuels (1) American (1) Americans (1) ammo (1) anarchy (1) animal (1) Aquaculture (1) aquapoinics (1) Armageddon (1) attack (1) Bartering (4) be prepared (2) Biological Weapons (2) Bird Flu (2) Blog (1) bug (1) Bug out (5) Bug-out Vehicle (1) Bunkers (4) Buy Bulk (1) calendar (15) camouflage (1) Channel (15) China (2) collapse (1) David Sarti (2) Defense Animals (1) dehydrate (1) dehydration (1) Dirty bomb (1) Disposable (1) Dollar a Day (1) Doomsday (3) Doomsday Preppers (19) Doug Huffman (2) Eat at Home (1) economic (1) Economic Collapse (12) Economic Domination (2) Edible insects (1) edition (1) electric grid (1) Electromagnetic pulse (6) electronics (1) Emegency (1) Emergency (4) EMP (12) EMP electromagnetic pulse (1) end of the world (16) Explosives (2) Extreme prep (1) family (1) Family survival (2) FBI (1) FEMA (1) fish (1) Food (4) Food storage (3) Foods (1) for (1) fried (1) fun (1) Garden (2) garden pool (1) gardens (1) generator (1) genetically modified (1) GMO (2) Gold panning (2) government (1) Great Depression (7) Guide (1) guns (1) guns confiscated (1) health (1) heirloom (1) heritage (1) Hillbilly faraday cage (1) home defense (1) Home security (1) Homemade (1) homestead (1) hormones (1) Hurricane Katrina (1) in (1) Indian (1) inflation (1) lawlessness (1) Life Hacks (1) Locusts on the Horizon (1) looting (1) maryland (1) Mayan (15) Micheal Snyder (1) milk (1) Monsanto (1) my patriot supply (1) Natgeo (17) National Geographic (15) Native (1) natural (1) Natural Disaster (2) NBC (1) Newbies (1) not a prepper (1) nuclear (1) Obama (1) Off-Grid (3) organic (1) out (1) pandemic (1) Paul Range (1) Peak Oil (1) pepper (1) polar shift (1) Pole Shift (1) Practical (1) prepare (1) prepared (1) preparedness (2) Preparedness Newbies (1) Preperation (1) Prepper (1) preppers (5) Primitive (1) processed (1) production (1) Quarantine (1) Quick Start (1) Reusable (1) Revolution (1) riots (1) root cellar (1) Sale Price (1) Save Money (2) season 1 (4) season 2 (4) security systems (1) Seedbank (1) seeds (1) shelter (1) Simplify (1) Sniper skills (1) solar flares (1) Sour Cream (1) storage (1) Superfood (1) Superstorm Sandy (1) Supplies (2) Survival (2) Survival Seedbanks (1) survival truckers (1) survivalist (2) sustainable (1) Tasty (1) terrorist (1) Terrorist Attack (2) the Crovel (1) Tim Ralston (1) to (1) tomatoes (1) tools (1) TwistedSifter (1) Underground bunkers (2) Underground Storage (1) urban farming (1) water (1) weapons (2) Whole Foods (1) wood gas (1) World (1) your (1)

Networked Blogs

Blog Archive

Copyright © 2013 Ready Emergency Site. WP Theme-junkie converted by BloggerTheme9
Blogger templates. Proudly Powered by Blogger.